The Times has an interesting take on a piece by one of its own journalists, Satham Sanghera, about Breakfast at Tiffany's.
On the front page of the website is a link Breakfast at Tiffany's is 'racist', with inverted commas that seem to hint that some mad lefty politically correct academic has come up with some crackpot criticism of one of our favourite films. But when you follow the link to the piece itself, it is clear from the headline, "Sorry, but Breakfast at Tiffany's is simply racist", that the racism accusation comes from the journalist.
So why has the front page disowned, or diluted, the suggestion?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment